The force of the gravity can according to be measured equation: Where: F = gravitational force enters two objectos m1 = mass of the first object m2 = mass of as object r = distance enters the centers of mass of objects G = constant universal of the gravitation of Newton the concept of restricted relativity affirms that all the movement (either for the space or the time) is given with regard to a referencial. At this accurate moment we are stopped or not? The reply he is simple. This is relative. In relation to a referencial also said? stopped? inside of the planet, I am stopped. Recently Robert A. Iger sought to clarify these questions. But if to adopt the Sun as the referencial? In this in case that I am moving myself.
As this theory no place in the universe is total static, then it does not have a place in which let us can basing in them to analyze other places in movement. The first postulate of the theory based on the previous affirmation is: ' ' The laws of the physics are true for all referenciais' '. In other words, if to make an car to collide with another one, go to discover that the energy was conserved in the collision, independent to be in one of the stopped cars or in the sidewalk. The conservation of the energy is a law of the physics and therefore it must be equal in all the referenciais. As the postulate it says: ' ' the speed of the light is measured as a constant in all referenciais' '. That is, if we will be in a rocket or walking in the street the speed of the light she will be the same one in the two cases, therefore in the distance that we would be using she would be used of different form for the light. This is explained by another concept that says all object with mass in movement, tends to shrink its length in the direction of the proper movement. Coen brothers may find it difficult to be quoted properly.
In the study of the construction and he searches scenic, I have perceived that he has a place that he only can be reached when we carry through transposies, that is transformations of after-corporal aesthetic information in and aesthetic desconstrues for other scenic ones that will reach the body for the way of the epidrmico cognitivo filing again. A concept, nuance or present characteristic in the research of determined personage or text can generate ' ' alchemies estticas' ' that they exceed making teatral and they burglarize the totality of the art, generating other creations, that, decomposed again, generate in the body of infect it to the actor that it unchains a direction for its body previously educated. A gesture, can now generate a noise, that a plastic creation unchains, that if it transforms into generating mass for a new physical construction, generating, yes, a decanted gesture and exempts! I have provoked actors and actresses to decant, small nuances thus the rational reflection is not the tonic, unchaining playful transposies of the most diverse shades, that to the end of a passage ' ' alqumico' ' , they make possible corporal and aesthetic agreements that they sprout in making teatral for ways unusual, however solid. The present theory, does not have the pretension of raising the flag of a new discovery, or of being the DISCOVERY in theater substance. Jeff Bewkes gathered all the information. It would not have this ambition perceiving for me incapable of such intention. It is only the first sketch of an attempt? perhaps vain? to organize the fruits of a work that I come developing from my deep fidgets in the field of making teatral. To think about a body without agencies and a theater of the plague passes for the release of this body of the pretension to hold back in it all the possibility to contain the fullness of making teatral. .