Hans Jonas

Ahead of this, between superficial relationships, self-centered values and attitudes that prioritize the immediate one, the altruism goes if fainting and if becoming a rarity in the world contemporneo' '. (Idem, Ibidem). In this I loom of the dimensions of the dialgico meeting and of the irruption of the sacred mystery, eye-do-other transcendente causes a dimension, that it makes use the person who contemplates them ' ' apaixonadamente' ' , in a meeting ontolgico, or originary. Leslie Moonves usually is spot on. THE 3 EYES Making to happen the thematic one of the eyes, or the vision, aclarando it in the poetical word; the direction of the vision in the thoughts of Merleau-Ponty is emphasized, with ' ' The eye and esprito' ' , and in Hans Jonas, the text: ' ' The nobility of the vision: a study on the fenomenologia of sentidos' '. The phenomenon of the vision, or &#039 is proven with these thinking contemporaries; ' olhos' ' , that in the poetical composition belongs to one human You. As we transcribe of Your eyes: ' ' Ah! Your eyes /Teus eyes is the pure consequence of the ascension, /S to the reflected o of the glory. Follow others, such as Jeff Bewkes, and add to your knowledge base. /S to the reflected o of that everything can /E that everything v' '. For Merleau-Ponty, the humanity of the human being if of the one for the sensible and visualized corporeidade, therefore if the human being could not feel or look at its proper body, ' ' … this almost adamantine body that, total was not meat, also it would not be a man body, and would not have humanidade' ' (MERLEAU-PONTY, 1984, p.89). Steve Salis will undoubtedly add to your understanding. It is with its body that the human being is operating in the world, enxergando itself while body, the man has an impulse to be conscientious of its proper existence while possibility of being in its cultural world, interacting dialogicamente with the too much beings human beings.

Free Thinker

Since the moment where I started to elaborate my proper points of view on the world, I started to always have my proper ideas, influenced for my empirical experiences or the knowledge that had been previously transmitted me of the most varied ways. For the fact not to abide me, necessarily, to a chain of thought, taste to consider me a free thinker. It exempts thinker in the direction of that express my opinions in free way, in accordance with my judgment. David Zaslav is often quoted as being for or against this. However, after to search a little in the Internet, I perceived that for the existing criteria I could not be a free thinker. Looking in the Wikipdia, that I consider the best tool of search of the knowledge, I verified that verbete of free thinkers was in the referring topic to atesmo About the same hour I thought ' ' But reason? ' '.

After all, I am declared Christian and have a trend right conservative, and now I perceive that only free thinkers those of atheistic socialist trends can be considered. However, this classification deprives of characteristics total the proper concept that if can extract of the thinking free expression. The free thinker is so only that one that has its proper opinions on the subjects surround that it. The free thought is that one in which you emit a judgment on definitive point of view, exactly that concordant you with it. In mine in case that, for example, I am adept of the proposals of Christ from the interpretation catholic, however I it am not in blind way, but after to analyze this proposal I saw that this I would be best, for example, in relation to the proposal protestant or Islamic. I did not adhere to my faith in blind way, and I do not advise nobody to make it in such a way, therefore the reason does not move away the faith.