Brazilian Government

She is necessary to remember, since soon, that the nessamatria dilatory game already comes of far. With effect, in 1960, the Organic Law of the PrevidnciSocial fixed the minimum age for the retirement in 55 years, without qualquerdistino of sex. The demagogues of always, little time later, however, suppressed this requirement elementary, what the worker allows the retirement in naqual age still meets in full physical and mental vigor; retirement that it does not mean removed for the aposentos, but simplesacrscimo of another income to the incomes of the work that follow being recebidossem any solution of continuity. The other problem that the retirement, according to sistemticaatual, does not decide, is of the renewal of the work ranks. If that one queobtm the benefit can (and it keeps physical and mental the vigor that allows it) follow working, the work rank that would have to become vacant follows busy, hindering the access of the population youngest to already the restricted one work market, whose growth if imposes. …

27 the Brazilian Government search to follow efficient models domercado world-wide, having as main referencial the German model of Bismarck.A social welfare of Germany is considered one of most advanced of the world, and establishes for the man a minimum age of 63 years for retirement, epara the woman, a minimum age of 60 years. In England, the minimum age is de60 years for both the sexos. However, if it becomes a paradox Brazil previdencirios aplicarconceitos of countries with advanced economy, where the situation dostrabalhadores is more steady. In other words, Brazil presents limitemais rigid for retirement (bigger time of contribution) without, however, offering a reasonable counterpart in the revenues for one aposentadoriatranqila. Today, the current politics of the social welfare for public osservidores, with bigger incomes or integral incomes, nocondiz with the basic rule of the replacement of income in a compatible platform with average aremunerao of the population.